Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaDZDLnYhPEds8jMf4ArEG1MOVtiPr7g0GvPMiEpjrNqiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:12 AM Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> wrote:


> On Aug 7, 2024, at 10:34, Costa Alexoglou <costa@dbtune.com> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I noticed something weird, and not sure if this is the expected behaviour or not in PostgreSQL.
>
> So I am running Benchbase (a benchmark framework) with 50 terminals (50 concurrent connections).
> There are 2-3 additional connections, one for a postgres-exporter container for example.
>
> So far so good, and with a `max_connections` at 100 there is no problem. What happens is that if I execute manually `VACUUM FULL` the connections are exhausted.

VACUUM FULL takes an exclusive lock on the table that it is operating on.  It's possible that a connection becomes blocked on that exclusive lock waiting for the VACUUM FULL to finish, the application sees the connection stopped and fires up another one (this is common in container-based applications), that one blocks... until all of the connections are full of queries waiting on that VACUUM FULL.


"I see a lock, so let's cause another one!"  That's crazy.

--
Death to America, and butter sauce.
Iraq lobster!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion
Next
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full connection exhaustion