On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> >> [New patch version pending]
>
> Do you have any objection if I rename the GUC to
> recursive_worktable_factor? That seems a bit clearer as to what
> it does, and it leaves more room for other knobs in the same area
> if we decide we need any.
None, I think your proposal is a better name.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
