On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 19:50, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > I've tried to sum up the various points from everybody into this doc
> > patch. Thanks all for replies.
>
> This seemed rather badly in need of copy-editing. How do you
> like the attached text?
Seems clear and does the job.
The unique violation thing is worryingly general. Do we know enough to
say that this is thought to occur only with a) multiple unique
constraints, b) exclusion constraints?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
