Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZZEi1UmT1fZOOyJGpJqRbE92D4TRK+KE-PKXK0N3sQ1MQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 2:30 PM Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, my other motivation for doing this was to simplify the numeric
> code. Even if this had zero performance benefit, as long as it didn't
> make things any slower, I would argue that it's worth doing.

I gathered that was the main motivation, and I agree. I looked over
0005 and don't see any issues.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Out-of-Order NOTIFY via GUC to Improve LISTEN/NOTIFY Throughput
Next
From: "Michael J. Baars"
Date:
Subject: Lossless transmission of double precision floating point