Re: Removing the TRACE_SORT macro - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Removing the TRACE_SORT macro
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jK8hh9EAHnLw+sQA4=f3oGzWzpDDjQAvWmW17nh9vHGOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Removing the TRACE_SORT macro  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Removing the TRACE_SORT macro
List pgsql-hackers
On 11 April 2016 at 21:43, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
Currently, debug instrumentation for sorting is only available if the
TRACE_SORT macro was defined when PostgreSQL was compiled. It is
defined by default, and so in practice it's always available; there is
really no upside to disabling it. "18.17. Developer Options" notes
this restriction for trace_sort, which is the only such restriction.

The number of TRACE_SORT elog() logging callers has grown
significantly in the past couple of releases. The associated "#ifdef
TRACE_SORT" crud has also grown.

I propose that we completely remove the TRACE_SORT macro, and all the
associated crud. Just having that as an option suggests that there is
some possible upside to disabling trace_sort, which is clearly not
true. I will write a patch doing this if there are no objections. I
think this is justifiable as clean-up for 9.6.

Yeh, sort has changed enough now that fixes weren't going to backpatch cleanly, so its a good time to do cleanup. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unused function from walsender.c