On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:34 PM, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I wrote 0002 - 0004, these were reviewed by Tomas. > 0005 is Haribabu's patch: Reviewed by Tomas and I.
I think it might be a good idea if these patches made less use of bytea and exposed the numeric transition values as, say, a 2-element array of numeric. Maybe this doesn't really matter, but it's not impossible that these values could be exposed somewhere, and a numeric is an awful lot more user-friendly than an essentially opaque bytea. One of the things I eventually want to figure out how to do with this is distributed aggregation across multiple shards, and I think it might be better to have the value being sent over the wire be something like {26.6,435.12} rather than \x1234...
Thoughts?
Rewriting something that works fine just before the deadline isn't a good plan.
"Might be better" isn't enough.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
