Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e' - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date
Msg-id 20160405070356.GA21967@toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Álvaro: I did document and test the extra types you added, but now that
I think about it a bit more, it's hard to argue that it's useful to have
a table, for example, depend on an extension. There's really nothing
about a table that "doesn't work without" an extension.

-- Abhijit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Alter or rename enum value
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Combining Aggregates