On 2 November 2017 at 22:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Comments on the design are welcome, but I was too late to the
>> commitfest, so there are other priorities. However, if you have a
>> strong opinion, feel free to voice it.
>
> I do not like replacing Lists piecemeal; that's a recipe for ongoing
> API breakage and back-patching pain. Plus we'll then have *four*
> different linked-list implementations in the backend, which sure
> seems like too many.
>
> We've jacked up the List API and driven a new implementation underneath
> once before. Maybe it's time to do that again.
I know some systems use hybrid linked array-lists, where linked list
cells are multi-element.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrolled_linked_list
I don't have much experience with them myself.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
