Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YH3W=fqvr0qxWAgi7rLCNGrqZ_fjb=OkWjpVUxNXwGEiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
List pgsql-hackers
On 5 November 2015 at 05:22, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I understand to text on wiki, the name is used for tool, that can do
> little bit more things, but it is often used for this technique (so it is
> much better than "rotate"). I don't understand well, why "crosstab" is too
> wrong name. This is pretty similar to COPY - and I know, so in first minutes
> hard to explain this difference between COPY and \copy to beginners, but
> after day of using there is not any problem.

I see constant confusion between \copy and COPY. It's a really good
reason NOT to overload other psql commands IMO.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql