Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YGJypycW4LbKWHQ_zB2TARP=fFRBHvsSm7T80N6Jt91nw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 31 March 2016 at 21:53, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
 

The worst thing about developing from my POV isn't something that actually affects core developers so much, namely the lack of a nice MSVC equivalent of PGXS.

I completely agree there. I wrote some documentation on how to make project files to build extensions, but it'd be nice to *generate* them instead, like we do for in-tree builds.

The problem is that we don't install all the Perl build stuff on Windows, it's only in the build tree. The time consuming part wx  is
/ sll be cleaning that up so it can run outside src/tools/msvc, getting it to use pg_config, and making it installable. Then of course there's the issue that it won't be available before 9.7 at the soonest... unless some brave soul backports it as an installable add-on. Which means extension authors are still screwed for 5+ years. That's the main reason I haven't tackled it - so far I've got by pretty well with VS project files + property sheets, and any PGXS-like capability almost certainly couldn't be backported so it's nearly useless for about 5 years.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] GSSAPI encryption support
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Suspicious behaviour on applying XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE.