On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>> On 2014-06-23 13:10:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I would be for excluding the pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_n, and
>>> > pg_temp_n schemas, and including public and pg_catalog.
>>>
>>> +1.
>>
>> Jeff, are you willing to update the patch that way? Seems we have
>> something several people can live with ;)
>
> I was hoping not to add a third set of filters (separate from the ones
> already implicit in either \dn or \dnS), but that's OK; as long as I get a
> doghouse I won't worry much about the color.
>
> I've included information_schema as well, in analogy to the inclusion of
> pg_catalog.
>
> Cheers and Thanks,
GAAH. I specifically verified before hitting send that the attachment
was listed. Nevertheless, it isn't there.
Note to self: stop using gmail offline to compose mail with
attachments to send later, it prevaricates. Attempted again with
regular gmail this time.
Cheers,
Jeff