On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 2014-06-23 13:10:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I would be for excluding the pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_n, and
>>>> > pg_temp_n schemas, and including public and pg_catalog.
>>>>
>>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Jeff, are you willing to update the patch that way? Seems we have
>>> something several people can live with ;)
>>
>> I was hoping not to add a third set of filters (separate from the ones
>> already implicit in either \dn or \dnS), but that's OK; as long as I get a
>> doghouse I won't worry much about the color.
>>
>> I've included information_schema as well, in analogy to the inclusion of
>> pg_catalog.
Is there any blocker on this patch? The patch looks good to me.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
