Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1z4bV3Z-Tv4EB179hL06RdL6gkQ4iDiHn41e-Gr9DcdSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Or have options for pg_dump and pg_restore to insert "set
>> synchronous_commit=off" into the SQL stream?
>
> It would be kind of neat if we had a command that would force all
> previously-asynchronous commits to complete.  It seems likely that
> very, very few people would care about intermediate pg_dump states, so
> we could do the whole dump asynchronously and then do "FORCE ALL
> COMMITS;" or whatever at the end.

Yeah, I was wondering what a fool-proof way of doing that would be,
without implementing a new feature.  Turning synchronous_commits back
on and then doing and committing a transaction guaranteed to generate
WAL would do it.

Would a simple 'select pg_switch_xlog();' always accomplish the desired flush?

Cheers,

Jeff



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: alter table tablename add column - breaks pl/pgsql function returns tablename