On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:08 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Hm, I'm somewhat confused, let me look into that. The JIT code shouldn't > really need to be changed here - it's the *generation* of expression > steps that's going wrong - which then later get turned into JITed code, > but that part worked previously for other expressions.
Turns out it's not a great idea to generate EEOP_AGG_STRICT_INPUT_CHECK expressions with nargs = 0. Head -> Desk. Pushed a fix (+ new assertion).