Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1wdnP=+9wZ6t3fLwxD++U0YGM6TJYzQVCz+6mLzbk431g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 8:58 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 I am planning
to push the first patch (v53-0001-Extend-the-BufFile-interface) in
this series tomorrow unless you have any comments on the same.


I'm getting compiler warnings now, src/backend/storage/file/sharedfileset.c line 288 needs to be:

bool        found PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY = false;

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: SyncRepLock acquired exclusively in default configuration
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?