Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+Ypd4DGTD3-cDL6BbB2yFmVcvr0pVpFC4zz6eWGMf6iA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:22 PM Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 8:58 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>  I am planning
>> to push the first patch (v53-0001-Extend-the-BufFile-interface) in
>> this series tomorrow unless you have any comments on the same.
>
>
>
> I'm getting compiler warnings now, src/backend/storage/file/sharedfileset.c line 288 needs to be:
>
> bool        found PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY = false;
>

Thanks for the report. Tom Lane has already fixed this [1].

[1] - https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e942af7b8261cd8070d0eeaf518dbc1a664859fd

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Improvements in Copy From
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [POC]Enable tuple change partition caused by BEFORE TRIGGER