Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:16 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:22 PM Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 8:58 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>  I am planning
> >> to push the first patch (v53-0001-Extend-the-BufFile-interface) in
> >> this series tomorrow unless you have any comments on the same.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm getting compiler warnings now, src/backend/storage/file/sharedfileset.c line 288 needs to be:
> >
> > bool        found PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY = false;
> >
>
> Thanks for the report. Tom Lane has already fixed this [1].
>
> [1] - https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e942af7b8261cd8070d0eeaf518dbc1a664859fd

As discussed, I have added a another test case for covering the out of
order subtransaction rollback scenario.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com