Re: Autovacuum different in 9.2.4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Autovacuum different in 9.2.4?
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1wC3NMRDUpmga=2rPUL9mTLk64tDVqBWcORE=L5t9FsiA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum different in 9.2.4?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum different in 9.2.4?  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Re: Autovacuum different in 9.2.4?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I seem to recall autovacuum changes landing for 9.2.4. Can someone please
> describe what those changes were and how they could affect usage?

Those landed in 9.2.3, see release notes for that version:
Fix performance problems with autovacuum truncation in busy workloads
(Jan Wieck)
Fix error in vacuum_freeze_table_age implementation (Andres Freund)

There should be no change in usage, unless you were taking some heroic
methods to overcome the problems and can now discontinue them.

Cheers,

Jeff



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: pass-through queries to foreign servers
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pass-through queries to foreign servers