On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > If I create a publication "for all tables", \dRp+ doesn't indicate it is for > all tables, it just gives a list of the tables. > > So it doesn't distinguish between a publication specified to be for all > tables (which will be dynamic regarding future additions), and one which > just happens to include all the table which currently exist. > > That seems unfortunate. Should the "for all tables" be included as another > column in \dRp and \dRp+, or at least as a footnote tag in \dRp+ ? >
+1. I was thinking the same. Attached patch adds "All Tables" column to both \dRp and \dRp+.
Looks good to me. Attached with regression test expected output changes.
