On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I create a publication "for all tables", \dRp+ doesn't indicate it is for
> all tables, it just gives a list of the tables.
>
> So it doesn't distinguish between a publication specified to be for all
> tables (which will be dynamic regarding future additions), and one which
> just happens to include all the table which currently exist.
>
> That seems unfortunate. Should the "for all tables" be included as another
> column in \dRp and \dRp+, or at least as a footnote tag in \dRp+ ?
>
+1. I was thinking the same. Attached patch adds "All Tables" column
to both \dRp and \dRp+.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
