Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Raúl Marín Rodríguez
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench
Date
Msg-id CAM6_UM6fy2ZmUw=f5epciSfF5PWT-GiL_X3HULzcLVw6LbWf1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I've implemented the overflow checks and made some benchmarks and the ipow() version became slower except with some specific inputs (base 0 for example). It's true that the new auxiliary functions could be optimized, but I don't think it makes sense to keep working on them just to match pow() speed.

I'm attaching both patches in case someone wants to have a look but I would go with the simpler solution (pgbench_pow_v10.patch).

Regards,
--
Raúl Marín Rodríguez 
carto.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadlock between concurrent index builds on different tables
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [table partitioning] How many partitions are possibel?