Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZTwNSHbS-OaL0g37zwCp1PEGQZ8XSS3iKeJ=wck2Z8XeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> I have zero doubt that in your case it is true and desirable. I just don't
> know that it is a positive solution to the problem as a whole. Your case is
> rather limited to your environment, which is rather limited to the type of
> user that your environment has. Which lends itself to the idea that this
> should be a Heroku Postgres thing, not a .Org wide thing.

If you look through the -general archives, or on stack overflow you'll
find ample evidence that it is a problem that lots of people have.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Move unused buffers to freelist