On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, the machine we called "ninefivealpha", which incidentally, failed to
> find a single bug in alpha2 thru beta2, is currently idle, and concurrent
> index creation times are a bugbear around these parts. Can somebody, either
> in this thread or privately, outline what sort of a test they'd like to see?
Any kind of CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY test, before and after.
I looked at a simple, random int4 column. That seems like a good case
to focus on, since there isn't too much other overhead. I think I
performed my test on an unlogged table, to make sure other overhead
was even further minimized.
--
Peter Geoghegan
