<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Robert Haas <span
dir="ltr"><<ahref="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com" target="_blank">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br
/><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">OnWed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Peter Geoghegan <<a href="mailto:pg@heroku.com">pg@heroku.com</a>>
wrote:<br/> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Corey Huinker <<a
href="mailto:corey.huinker@gmail.com">corey.huinker@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br /> >> I'm willing, but I'm too new
tothe codebase to be an effective reviewer<br /> >> (without guidance). The one thing I can offer in the mean
timeis this: my<br /> >> company/client nearly always has a few spare AWS machines on the largish<br /> >>
sidewhere I can compile uncommitted patches and benchmark stuff for y'all.<br /> ><br /> > I think that this
particularpatch is close to being a slam-dunk, so I<br /> > don't think it's particularly needed here. But
thanks.<br/><br /></span>It never hurts to have a few extra performance test results - I'm all<br /> in favor of Corey
doingsome testing.<br /><br /> Also, I'd be in favor of you updating the patch to reflect the<br /> comments from Tom
andSimon on November 17th.<br /><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br /> --<br /> Robert Haas<br />
EnterpriseDB:<a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br
/>The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<br /></font></span></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Sure,
themachine we called "ninefivealpha", which incidentally, failed to find a single bug in alpha2 thru beta2, is
currentlyidle, and concurrent index creation times are a bugbear around these parts. Can somebody, either in this
threador privately, outline what sort of a test they'd like to see?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra"><br/></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
