Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSUwaPZ3fVTQaugDWucs4MJHBcYYWD726tiiQrwHaVE0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Are you talking about  configurable at./configure time, or guc?

I meant a GUC. I think a ./configure option is overkill.

What about the existing caller of strxfrm(), convert_string_datum()?

--
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)