Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSQGbhyFZNjWNEsZRoZZFE=C_4+u7dswd4s+XKY_EWXTw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> What about the existing caller of strxfrm(), convert_string_datum()?

I mean, the caller exists in all back-branches, not just 9.5.


--
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)