Re: debug_sortsupport GUC? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZR_Phf6Bcq7XwCRu0Ck28biw+oj-GuKbYgrBrfYdOjB3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to debug_sortsupport GUC?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> So if these debugging elogs are to be kept at all, I propose that rather
> than being compile-time options they should be controlled by a
> debug_sortsupport GUC. Opinions?

This seems like a reasonable idea. Why wouldn't it just be under the
existing trace_sort GUC, though? That's been enabled by default since
8.1. It's already defined in pg_config_manual.h.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?