Re: debug_sortsupport GUC? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
Date
Msg-id 874mpcbhom.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
>> So if these debugging elogs are to be kept at all, I propose that>> rather than being compile-time options they
shouldbe controlled by>> a debug_sortsupport GUC. Opinions?
 
Peter> This seems like a reasonable idea. Why wouldn't it just be underPeter> the existing trace_sort GUC, though?
That'sbeen enabled byPeter> default since 8.1. It's already defined in pg_config_manual.h.
 

Ungh... yes, it's defined by default, but it clearly still requires
keeping the #ifdefs in there in order to still build if someone manually
undefines it. Was hoping to avoid the #ifdefs entirely - perhaps the
existing #ifdefs should just be removed? If it's been enabled since 8.1
it seems unlikely to be causing anyone any issues.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric