Re: debug_sortsupport GUC? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQiGkLVFwdSCa+WT17eoCp4CYbhap6gMfDk3Sauqa_J1A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> Ungh... yes, it's defined by default, but it clearly still requires
> keeping the #ifdefs in there in order to still build if someone manually
> undefines it. Was hoping to avoid the #ifdefs entirely - perhaps the
> existing #ifdefs should just be removed? If it's been enabled since 8.1
> it seems unlikely to be causing anyone any issues.

I'd vote for removing the #ifdefs, and using trace_sort.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)