On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I'm tempted to do is trying to document that, as a point of
> policy, parallel query in 9.6 uses up to (workers + 1) times the
> resources that a single session might use. That includes not only CPU
> but also things like work_mem and temp file space. This obviously
> isn't ideal, but it's what could be done by the ship date.
Where would that be documented, though? Would it need to be noted in
the case of each such GUC?
--
Peter Geoghegan
