On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's probably wrong to worry that an array-of-arrays is going
> to be meaningfully slower than a single array here. It's basically
> costing you some small number of additional memory references per
> tuple, which I suspect isn't all that relevant for a bulk operation
> that does I/O, writes WAL, locks buffers, etc.
This analysis makes perfect sense to me.
--
Peter Geoghegan
