Re: kqueue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: kqueue
Date
Msg-id 20160913185342.ryfxbwwbjnh6acnu@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: kqueue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: kqueue
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-09-13 14:47:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also I notice that the WaitEventSet thread started with a simple
> pgbench test, so I don't really buy the claim that that's not a
> way that will reach the problem.

You can reach it, but not when using 1 core:one pgbench thread:one
client connection, there need to be more connections than that. At least
that was my observation on x86 / linux.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem