Re: jsonb status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: jsonb status
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZR9gJYC=mDE7hxKb8qoiJfFqM7E3cTgbDtxvD8Y6JhZcQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonb status  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: jsonb status  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> * Jsonb vs JsonbValue is just bad, the latter needs to be renamed, and
>   there needs to be a very clear explanation about why two forms exist
>   and what each is used for.

I've pushed some comments to Github that further clarify the
distinction: https://github.com/feodor/postgres/commit/5835de0b55bdfc02ee59e2affb6ce25995587dc4

I did not change the name of JsonbValue, because I sincerely could not
think of a better one. The distinction is subtle.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: four minor proposals for 9.5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to send transaction commit/rollback stats to the stats collector unconditionally.