Re: Compression of full-page-writes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQGGgKUKt_P+m3jpce7um=MbPKHwOrhez_O_8ncgG8NFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Compression of full-page-writes  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Compression of full-page-writes  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>   [the amount of WAL generated during running pgbench]
>   4302 MB (compress_backup_block = off)
>   1521 MB (compress_backup_block = on)

Interesting.

I wonder, what is the impact on recovery time under the same
conditions? I suppose that the cost of the random I/O involved would
probably dominate just as with compress_backup_block = off. That said,
you've used an SSD here, so perhaps not.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Satoshi Nagayasu
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression of full-page-writes