Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HPq9UHE85H9QrC=8STCEBirsU+qT7czjdD5R9DWm_h5gg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> Back in 2005/6, I advocated a block sampling method, as described by
>> Chaudri et al (ref?)
>
> I don't think that anyone believes that not doing block sampling is
> tenable, fwiw. Clearly some type of block sampling would be preferable
> for most or all purposes.

We do block sampling now. But then we select rows from those blocks uniformly.

Incidentally, if you mean Surajit Chaudhuri, he's a Microsoft Research
lead so I would be nervous about anything he's published being
patented by Microsoft.


-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: stats for network traffic WIP