Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HPkz_fmhF8Pttp=TRk2XS+P5LhRbBdeA092RO88DZrt0A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 13:00, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:53 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:

> I vote to just remove them. I think that most people won't update
> their queries until they are forced to do so.  I don't think it
> matters very much when we force them to do that.

I would tend to agree.

If we wanted to have a deprecation period I think the smooth way to do
it would be to introduce two new functions/views with the new split.
Then mark the entire old view as deprecated. That way there isn't a
mix of new and old columns in the same view/function.

I don't think it's really necessary to do that here but there'll
probably be instances where it would be worth doing.

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Global Unique Index