<p dir="ltr"><br /> On 25 Feb 2014 08:54, "Heikki Linnakangas" <<a
href="mailto:hlinnakangas@vmware.com">hlinnakangas@vmware.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > I hope
thereare no applications relying on pageinspect. It's a very low-level tool. Or if someone has written a nice GUI
aroundit, I'd like to hear about it so that I can start using it :-).<br /> ><br /> ><br /> >> I see more
flexibilityto keep them as they are now, as integers,<br /> >> users can always tune their queries to do this
post-processingwith<br /> >> to_hex for them as they've (always?) been doing.<br /> ><br /> ><br /> >
Agreed.With an int4, you can more easily check for a particular bit etc.<p dir="ltr">What about making it a bit()
column?<pdir="ltr">What I would love to see is a function added to page inspect that takes these two fields and returns
alist of symbolic names or perhaps a tuple of booleans.
