Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From German Becker
Subject Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence
Date
Msg-id CALyjCLugLBkgGm2D=cZJSs+wo4_cPOYjDcrRiChBSYmPv3+K0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe I didn't explain correctly. I am using COPY/pg_dump/pg_restore for
> migration (and it is working fine). The streaming replication is for
> hot-standby replication *once migrated*. Thing is I disbable archving and
> set wal_level to minimal, when migrating the large portion of data, to make
> it faster. Then I switch to wal_level=hot_standby, i.e the "production"
> configuration, and the WAL segment seuqence seems to overlap with the
> segments generated with the other setting.
>

Though, now you understand it's not what it looks like, right? :-)


--
Amit Langote

I didn't quite understand what you mean by that... But anyways so do you people think this sequence number overlap is "normal" ?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: background processes vs. hot standby
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: getting rid of freezing