Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFFeckomHyN8+q=w+TfnkogBEPLk7DY-ek_m39U=MDvFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence  (German Becker <german.becker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence  (German Becker <german.becker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Maybe I didn't explain correctly. I am using COPY/pg_dump/pg_restore for
> migration (and it is working fine). The streaming replication is for
> hot-standby replication *once migrated*. Thing is I disbable archving and
> set wal_level to minimal, when migrating the large portion of data, to make
> it faster. Then I switch to wal_level=hot_standby, i.e the "production"
> configuration, and the WAL segment seuqence seems to overlap with the
> segments generated with the other setting.
>

Though, now you understand it's not what it looks like, right? :-)


--
Amit Langote



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to .gitignore
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Cost limited statements RFC