On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:34 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >> > ... I found that the command tag of >> > ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN is "ALTER TABLE", not "ALTER VIEW". >> >> > =# ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW hoge RENAME COLUMN j TO x; >> > ALTER TABLE >> >> > Is this intentional? Or bug? >> >> Seems like an oversight.
Thanks for the check!
> The same issue is with ALTER FOREIGN TABLE
Yes.
> Attached patch fixes that for ALTER VIEW , ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW and ALTER FOREIGN TABLE
You introduced subtype in your patch, but I think it's better and simpler to just give relationType to AlterObjectTypeCommandTag() if renaming the columns (i.e., renameType = OBJECT_COLUMN).
That's works perfectly along with future oversight about the command tag.
To avoid this kind of oversight about command tag, I'd like to add regression tests to make sure that SQL returns valid and correct command tag. But currently there seems no mechanism for such test, in regression test. Right??
Do we really need a regression test cases for such small oversights?
