On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:47 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-May-10, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > That sounds fine to me, Attached v6 patch which has the changes for the same.
>
> What about defining a function (maybe a static inline function in
> defrem.h) that is marked noreturn and receives the DefElem and
> optionally pstate, and throws the error? I think that would avoid the
> patch's need to have half a dozen copies of the "duplicate_error:" label
> and ereport stanza.
+1 to have a static inline function which just reports the error.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
