Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect.
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACWLV+g=a7ojcLo-R52HeAUZtGdG6XPG6nTFoo7S7e17fw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect.
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:47 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've now done several runs with your patch and not seen the test failure.
> > > However, I think we ought to rethink this API a bit rather than just
> > > apply the patch as-is.  Even if it were documented, relying on
> > > errormsg = NULL to mean something doesn't seem like a great plan.
> >
> > Sorry for being late in the game, occupied with other stuff.
> >
> > How about using private_data of XLogReaderState for
> > read_local_xlog_page_no_wait, something like this?
> >
> > typedef struct ReadLocalXLogPageNoWaitPrivate
> > {
> >     bool end_of_wal;
> > } ReadLocalXLogPageNoWaitPrivate;
> >
> > In read_local_xlog_page_no_wait:
> >
> >             /* If asked, let's not wait for future WAL. */
> >             if (!wait_for_wal)
> >            {
> >                 private_data->end_of_wal = true;
> >                 break;
> >            }
> >
> >     /*
> >      * Opaque data for callbacks to use.  Not used by XLogReader.
> >      */
> >     void       *private_data;
>
> I found an easy way to reproduce this consistently (I think on any server):
>
> I basically generated huge WAL record (I used a fun extension that I
> wrote - https://github.com/BRupireddy/pg_synthesize_wal, but one can
> use pg_logical_emit_message as well)
> session 1:
> select * from pg_synthesize_wal_record(1*1024*1024); --> generate 1 MB
> of WAL record first and make a note of the output lsn (lsn1)
>
> session 2:
> select * from pg_get_wal_records_info_till_end_of_wal(lsn1);
> \watch 1
>
> session 1:
> select * from pg_synthesize_wal_record(1000*1024*1024);  --> generate
> ~1 GB of WAL record and we see ERROR:  could not read WAL at XXXXX in
> session 2.
>
> Delay the checkpoint (set checkpoint_timeout to 1hr) just not recycle
> the wal files while we run pg_walinspect functions, no other changes
> required from the default initdb settings on the server.
>
> And, Thomas's patch fixes the issue.

Here's v2 patch (up on Thomas's v1 at [1]) using private_data to set
the end of the WAL flag. Please have a look at it.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGLtswFk9ZO3WMOqnDkGs6dK5kCdQK9gxJm0N8gip5cpiA%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Пантюшин Александр Иванович
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong rows count in EXPLAIN
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations