Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACW+bVF8oP1xyoPFx3Fp8Rk=y533D6Nk24E+dLoKU5egWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > I don't see any problem in removing this extra parameter.
> > >
> > > However another thought, can it be used to report a bit meaningful
> > > error for field size < 0 check?
> >
> > column_no was used for that purpose in the past, but commit 0e319c7ad7
> > changed that. If we want to use column_no in the log message again,
> > it's better to check why commit 0e319c7ad7 got rid of column_no from
> > the message.
>
> I noticed that displaying of column information is present and it is
> done in a different way. Basically cstate->cur_attname is set with the
> column name before calling CopyReadBinaryAttribute function. If there
> is any error in CopyReadBinaryAttribute function,
> CopyFromErrorCallback will be called. CopyFromErrorCallback function
> takes care of displaying the column name by using cstate->cur_attname.
> I tried simulating this and it displays the column name neatly in the
> error message.:
> postgres=# copy t1 from '/home/db/copydata/t1_copy.bin' with (format 'binary');
> ERROR:  invalid field size
> CONTEXT:  COPY t1, line 1, column c1
> I feel we can safely remove the parameter as in the patch.
>

thanks for this information.

+1 for this patch.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view