Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvq=0n6y3dX5JHqS9psJ_dBj9Z-ADsh0AO9dCFoUNMKvcw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 15:28, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 15:37 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes both the missing parallel worker information
> > and puts the properties on a single line for format=text.
>
> Thank you.
>
> I noticed some strange results in one case where one worker had a lot
> more batches than another. After I investigated, I think everything is
> fine -- it seems that one worker was getting more tuples from the
> underlying parallel scan. So everything looks good to me.

Thanks for having a look at this. I just pushed it.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: missing support for Microsoft VSS Writer
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute