Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACVGGyZzDxf7_h6ex=Q4rvDRSv6um4zH7jBY9j4S2kSPHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 1:03 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> For 0004, we need to resolve why callers are using XLOG_BLCKSZ and we
> can fix that independently, as discussed here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACV=C1GZT9XQRm4iN1NV1T=hLA_hsGWNx2Y5-G+mSwdhNg@mail.gmail.com

Thanks. I started a new thread for this -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACWBRFac2TingD3PE3w2EBHXUHY3%3DAEEZPJmqhpEOBGExg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Document efficient self-joins / UPDATE LIMIT techniques.
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby