On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:16:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Doing that in a separate patch is fine by me.
>
> I have applied the patch for the tab entries, then could not resist
> poking at the parts for the db entries. This leads to more reduction
> than the other one actually, as of:
> 4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-)
>
> Like the previous one, the functions have the same names and the field
> names are updated to fit in the picture. Thoughts?
Likewise, is there a plan to add function generation macros for
pg_stat_get_bgwriter, pg_stat_get_xact and so on?
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
