On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:39 AM David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If the backend is terminated within the user specified timeout then
>> the function returns true, otherwise false.
>
> I’m suggesting an option for the second case to fail instead of returning false.
>
That seems fine.
>
>> >
>> > I could imagine, in theory at least, wanting to wait for a backend to go idle as well as for it disappearing.
Scopecreep in terms of this patch's goal but worth at least considering now.
>> >
>>
>> IIUC, do we need a new option, something like pg_wait_backend(pid,
>> timeout, waituntil) where "waituntil" if specified "idle" waits until
>> the given backend goes to idle mode, or "termination" waits until
>> termination?
>>
>> If my understanding is wrong, could you please explain more?
>
>
> Yes, this describes what i was thinking.
>
+1.
I will implement these functionality and post a new patch soon.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
