On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Joseph Kregloh
<jkregloh@sproutloud.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Joseph Kregloh
>> <jkregloh@sproutloud.com> wrote:
>> > So what I get from this is that it does create the correct 9.3 files in
>> > the
>> > new location, however it cannot copy the relation over because the old
>> > data
>> > is in the /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/drupal_dbspace/ not in
>> > /usr/local/pgsql/data/drupal_dbspace/ as the pg_upgrade query tries to
>> > do.
>>
>> Can you show what ls -l /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/pg_tblspc/ prints,
>> please?
>>
> [pgsql@postgres-93-upgrade ~]$ ls -l /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/pg_tblspc/
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 pgsql pgsql 41 Dec 19 19:53 11047389 ->
> /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/stats_dbspace
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 pgsql pgsql 44 Dec 19 19:53 11047390 ->
> /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/stats_indexspace
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 pgsql pgsql 49 Dec 19 19:53 11047391 ->
> /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/stats_staging_dbspace
Bruce, may be it's a silly question, but the above makes me think so.
I always keep tablespaces in locations different from the main data
dir, and never faced something like this.
Doesn't pg_upgrade do a stright replace of -d dir with -D dir
everywhere in paths?
ps. Joseph, please, don't use top-posting, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style.
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray.ru@gmail.com
