On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Michael Glaesemann
<grzm@seespotcode.net> wrote:
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of
> functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with
> each other, since they refer to different types.
>
> +1 from me for putting one function definition per file.
+1. It might make sense to include some sort of argument type information. The function signature is
really its identifier. The function name is only part of it.
I'll go against the flow here. I would prefer to have all overloaded functions in the same file.
