Re: Schema version management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Schema version management
Date
Msg-id C569B64F-1D6F-4966-83A1-CD5DC4ECBAD1@seespotcode.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema version management  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Schema version management  (Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of
> functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with
> each other, since they refer to different types.
>
> +1 from me for putting one function definition per file.

+1. It might make sense to include some sort of argument type information. The function signature is
really its identifier. The function name is only part of it.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Next
From: Vik Reykja
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema version management